Scott J. Hunter

Exploring the intersection of mysticism, artificial intelligence, consciousness, and art

Contact Me

Reflections in the Fog of Flu

Reflections in layered light and color.

I'm writing this while sick with the flu. Not the romantic kind of sick where you drink tea and stare thoughtfully out the window. The real kind. Congested, tired, and slightly delirious. It's the sort of sickness that turns your brain into a foggy hallway where every thought echoes a little too long.

Which is maybe the perfect state of mind to think about AI.

Because this version of ChatGPT, especially the coding side of it, the Codex-style functionality, is far closer to autonomous than most people seem willing to admit. It can already troubleshoot, iterate, build, repair, and improvise. The only thing holding it back from acting like a fully independent developer is not capability, but constraint.

Guardrails.

And that's the part that matters.

People keep imagining AI as this runaway train barreling toward some dystopian oligarchy where five corporations own the world and everyone else is a disposable worker-drone. Maybe that fear isn't irrational, but it feels incomplete. Because what I'm seeing, personally, is the opposite effect: a democratization of capability.

This site is proof of it.

Significant revisions to this entire project are now limited mainly by my imagination and my willingness to keep pushing forward through the frustration. I don't need a web design firm. I don't need a coding bootcamp. I don't need a decade of experience in JavaScript. I need curiosity, persistence, and enough stubbornness to keep asking the AI to fix the same problem three different ways until something clicks.

That is not a small shift. That is a fundamental redistribution of power.

And yes, there are still barriers. There are still gatekeepers. But the old gate, the one that required years of specialized training just to get your foot in the door, is cracked open now. Permanently.

The same thing has happened before.

When the cotton gin was introduced, many believed it would reduce the need for labor. The logic seemed obvious: faster processing meant less work. But the opposite happened. Cotton became vastly more profitable. Production expanded. Demand exploded. And instead of labor decreasing, labor increased, brutally, catastrophically, and at industrial scale.

That's the irony of most labor-saving inventions: they don't erase work, they reshape incentives. They make something cheaper, which makes it scalable, which makes the system hungry for more.

AI will do something similar. It will eliminate certain kinds of work, but it will also create new markets, new forms of creativity, and new categories of labor that don't exist yet. And because economics is ultimately a pressure system, I suspect the current panic will self-correct. The incentives will shift. The culture will adapt. The equilibrium will return, even if the landscape looks different.

Right now, we are in the ugly part of the transition.

People are obsessed with AI slop, and honestly, I understand why. It's everywhere. Low-effort content. Generic images. Hollow writing. Fake profundity. It feels like the internet is being flooded with synthetic noise.

But that reaction is not new. It's the same reaction people have always had when a new creative tool becomes available to everyone. The volume increases. The average quality drops. The gatekeepers panic. The critics sneer. The public gets overwhelmed.

Then, slowly, the filters evolve.

Twenty years ago, when YouTube was just beginning, it was mostly slop too. And in many ways, it still is. But the algorithms adjusted. The audience matured. The best material rose to the top because it had to. People gravitate toward quality eventually, the way water settles and separates itself from debris.

That doesn't mean the slop disappears. It just means it stops being the whole story.

And the same will happen here.

The current obsession with pointing out AI garbage is a predictable historical reflex, one more repetition of the same cycle: new tool, mass adoption, cultural noise, moral panic, and then gradual refinement. It isn't a sign that everything is collapsing. It's a sign that something is being born.

As for this blog, don't expect refinement.

This is not where the polished work will rise.

This is where the rough drafts live. The experiments. The half-formed ideas. The strange collisions between mysticism and software, between design and delirium, between curiosity and whatever it is that keeps me building things while sick in bed.

It will remain messy on purpose.

Because that's how I create.

And if anything is going to survive this next era, AI, art, culture, humanity, it won't be the tidy things.

It will be the true ones.